Where does the data go?
Patient records, financial documents and confidential information come with restrictions on location, access and retention. Generic AI deployments may not satisfy them.
Embed advanced AI into healthcare and financial software — with open-weight models, qualified local inference and a fully managed infrastructure layer.
Tell us what you're doing with frontier AI. We'll tell you whether it can run privately, where it can run, and at what cost.
THE CHALLENGE
SaaS providers are under pressure to bring AI into their products. But when customers operate in healthcare or finance, an API key alone is not a deployment strategy.
Patient records, financial documents and confidential information come with restrictions on location, access and retention. Generic AI deployments may not satisfy them.
Self-hosting a model means owning capacity planning, inference performance, upgrades, incident response and the growing security surface.
Models, hardware economics and requirements change fast. Yesterday's best model can become tomorrow's expensive bottleneck.
PRIVATE AI, EXPLAINED
Three ideas make independent, privately operated AI possible. Here's what they mean — without the jargon.
AI processing within agreed privacy, security and operational boundaries — with controlled access, defined data flows and clear retention policies.
Trained AI models whose weights can be deployed independently on chosen infrastructure, subject to their licences — instead of calling their creator's API for every request.
Prompts and documents are processed where the AI model actually runs: on-premises or in an approved datacenter that meets the relevant geographical and governance requirements.
THE SENTINEL APPROACH
From the first workload assessment to production operations, we focus on the whole system: model quality, security, performance, cost and change.
Understand the existing frontier-model use case, data sensitivity, quality expectations, latency, throughput and regulatory constraints.
Compare suitable open-weight models against representative tasks. Evaluate accuracy, hallucination risk, response times and total cost.
Evaluate existing hardware providers and customer environments. Deploy only where relevant location, security and operational controls can be satisfied.
Manage infrastructure health, access controls, software security, lifecycle operations and evidence-based reporting within agreed responsibilities.
Re-benchmark emerging models and configurations. Recommend validated changes that improve quality, capacity or economics without uncontrolled upgrades.
DEPLOYMENT WITHOUT OWNED HARDWARE
We don't sell servers. Our platform is being built to use suitable existing infrastructure, reducing hardware lock-in while keeping each workload inside its approved boundaries.
Deploy open-weight models on qualified, rented GPU capacity in appropriate local datacenters. Controlled environments without buying or maintaining your own hardware.
Run inference on customer-controlled infrastructure while using the same disciplined model evaluation, lifecycle management and governance approach.
Important distinction: a local datacenter address alone does not establish sovereignty or compliance. Eligibility depends on the full service, including legal jurisdiction, administration, subcontractors, data handling and evidence.
BUILT FOR REGULATED SOFTWARE
We work with SaaS companies bringing AI into sensitive workflows — not to replace their products, but to power them.
EPD / EHR systems, care platforms and medical-administration SaaS integrating assistive AI with patient-data safeguards.
FinTech, RegTech and insurance platforms embedding AI into confidential financial-document and operational processes.
Initial focus: document and workflow intelligence. Clinical recommendations, autonomous credit decisions and other high-risk applications require additional, use-case-specific assessment.
PRIVACY, SECURITY & GOVERNANCE
Private inference should be demonstrable — not assumed. We design around technical controls, qualified infrastructure, contractual requirements and continuous evidence collection.
Discuss your requirementsReferences to frameworks indicate relevant assessment considerations, not certification or a claim that this proposed service already complies with every requirement.
Sentinel Private AI is an initiative of Sentinel IT B.V., a Netherlands-based software engineering company founded in 2006. Our foundation is enterprise software delivery, information security and practical AI engineering.
We're translating that experience into a standardized managed inference platform for SaaS providers — not another custom software agency or GPU reseller.
* Sentinel IT B.V.'s existing certification must not be interpreted as certification of the proposed Sentinel Private AI service or any particular deployment.
APPLICATIONS OPEN · 3 PARTNER PLACES
We're inviting three ambitious healthcare and financial SaaS companies into our Founding Design Partner Program.
Bring a real workload. We'll explore whether open-weight AI can meet your quality, security, performance and cost requirements — and map a credible path to deployment.
Initial scoping is without commitment. Any benchmark engagement, pilot or production deployment will be scoped and agreed separately. Admission is selective, not first-come-first-served.
A few details are enough to start. Please don't include patient, financial or other sensitive records.
For some tasks, yes — for others, not yet. We assess each workload against representative examples and compare task quality, latency, reliability and cost. We will recommend staying with a frontier provider if the private alternative isn't ready.
No. It can run on premises or on appropriate cloud capacity in a datacenter. A deployment qualifies only when its complete technical, contractual, jurisdictional and operational controls meet the customer's requirements.
Inference necessarily processes data temporarily. Our design objective is zero persistent storage of prompt and response content: no content logging, training, backups or retained request bodies. Any such guarantee requires verification of the complete deployment, including the underlying provider. Ordinary business contact correspondence is separate from inference data.
No. The model is hardware-independent: we qualify and use existing provider capacity or customer-owned infrastructure. Our own value lies in model evaluation, deployment orchestration, governance, security and continuous operations.
No. Requirements differ by customer, use case, jurisdiction and provider. We aim to assess and evidence the relevant controls. A software layer or local GPU alone does not grant legal compliance or third-party certification.
We review the use case and commercial fit, arrange an introductory technical discussion where appropriate, and outline a potential assessment or pilot. Initial exploration is non-binding; any funded work and deliverables are agreed separately.
THE NEXT STEP